临床医学论著

MRI结合生化标志物对多发性硬化的临床诊断价值探究

  • 孙雅丽 ,
  • 蔡志平 ,
  • 杨小敏 ,
  • 袁园 ,
  • 姜波 ,
  • 苏男 ,
  • 王伟
展开
  • 1.内蒙古科技大学包头医学院,内蒙古包头 014040;
    2.巴彦淖尔市医院神经内科;
    3.内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第一附属医院神经内一科
蔡志平

收稿日期: 2025-05-08

  网络出版日期: 2026-06-24

Clinical diagnostic value of MRI combined with biochemical markers in multiple sclerosis

  • SUN Yali ,
  • CAI Zhiping ,
  • YANG Xiaomin ,
  • YUAN Yuan ,
  • JIANG Bo ,
  • SU Nan ,
  • WANG Wei
Expand
  • 1. Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014040, China;
    2. Department of Neurology, Bayannur Hospital;
    3. The First Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology

Received date: 2025-05-08

  Online published: 2026-06-24

摘要

目的: 探究磁共振成像(megnetic resonace image, MRI)结合血液生化标志物对多发性硬化的临床诊断价值。方法: 选取2023年1月-2024年9月收治的30例多发性硬化患者为观察组,按病情程度分成轻症组(18例)、重症组(12例),同期健康体检者50例为对照组,比较观察组与对照组两组患者的血液生化标志物水平;观察组患者进行MRI检查后,分析多发性硬化患者的MRI影像学特征,应用受试者特征工作曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC)分析MRI联合生化标志物对多发性硬化的诊断价值。结果: (1)30例多发性硬化症患者MRI检查发现135个病理改变区域,主要病变分布于脑干、侧脑室周边、小脑和脑白质;(2)MRI平扫病变表现为T1低信号,T2和FLAIR序列为高信号,侧脑室周围病变垂直于长轴;MRI冠状位和矢状位平扫T2显示高信号,呈多空间分布;(3)观察组患者血清神经特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-specific enolase, NSE)、髓鞘碱性蛋白(myelin basic protein, MBP)和血清S100B蛋白(serum S100 calcium-binding protein B, S100B)水平高于对照组(P<0.05),重症组患者的血清NSE、S100B水平均高于轻症组(P<0.05)。(4)ROC曲线分析显示MRI联合生化标志物对多发性硬化的灵敏度、特异度、准确度分别为87.50%、93.75%、91.25%,高于单独使用MRI和生化标志物指标的灵敏度、特异度、准确度。结论: 血液生化标志物结合MRI检测,不仅能够显示出多发性硬化的病灶,且有助于提高该疾病的诊断价值。

本文引用格式

孙雅丽 , 蔡志平 , 杨小敏 , 袁园 , 姜波 , 苏男 , 王伟 . MRI结合生化标志物对多发性硬化的临床诊断价值探究[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2026 , 42(4) : 73 -78 . DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2026.04.012

Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with blood biochemical markers in multiple sclerosis. Methods: Thirty patients with multiple sclerosis admitted from January 2023 to September 2024 were selected as the observation group. According to the severity of the disease, they were divided into mild group (18 patients) and severe group (12 patients). At the same time, 50 healthy subjects were selected as the control group. The levels of blood biochemical markers in the observation group and the control group were compared. After MRI examination, the MRI imaging features of patients with multiple sclerosis were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the diagnostic value of MRI combined with biochemical markers for multiple sclerosis. Results: (1) 135 pathological changes were found in 30 patients with multiple sclerosis by MRI, and the main lesions were distributed in brainstem, periventricular, cerebellum and white matter. (2) MRI plain scan showed low signal in T1, high signal in T2 and FLAIR sequences, and the lesions around the lateral ventricle were perpendicular to the long axis. MRI coronal and sagittal plain scan T2 showed high signal, showing multiple spatial distribution. (3) The levels of serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE), myelin basic protein (MBP) and serum S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of serum NSE and S100B in the severe group were higher than those in the mild group (P<0.05). (4) ROC curve analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI combined with biochemical markers for multiple sclerosis were 87.50%, 93.75% and 91.25%, respectively, which were higher than those of MRI and biochemical markers alone. Conclusion: Blood biochemical markers combined with MRI detection can not only show the lesions of multiple sclerosis, but also help to improve the diagnostic value of the disease.

参考文献

[1] 熊付伟, 李璐, 龚博. MR3D-DIR序列联合1H-MRS对多发性硬化患者脑内病变的检测价值分析[J]. 黑龙江医药科学, 2024, 47(4): 53-56.
[2] 陈佳露. 脑多发性硬化的CT、MRI诊断研究[J].影像研究与医学应用, 2024, 8(22): 121-123.
[3] 李咏梅, 刘亚欧, 严福华. 推动MRI对多发性硬化的诊断和研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2023, 57(6): 581-585.
[4] Solomon AJ, Arrambide G, Brownlee WJ, et al. Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis:an updated consensus approach[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2023, 22(8): 750-768.
[5] Travers BS, Tsang BK, Barton JL. Multiple sclerosis:Diagnosis, disease-modifying therapy and prognosis[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2022, 51(4): 199-206.
[6] 中华医学会神经病学分会神经免疫学组. 多发性硬化诊断与治疗中国指南(2023版)[J].中华神经科杂志, 2024, 57(1): 10-23.
[7] Yamout B, Al-Jumah M, Sahraian MA, et al. Consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: 2023 revision of the MENACTRIMS guidelines[J]. Mult Scler Relat Disord, 2024, 83: 105435.
[8] Jakimovski D, Awan S, Eckert SP, et al. Multiple sclerosis in children: differential diagnosis, prognosis and disease-modifying treatment[J]. CNS Drugs, 2022, 36(1): 45-59.
[9] 王伟柱, 周衡, 宋田, 等. 中央静脉征在复发缓解型多发性硬化中的MRI特征及诊断价值[J]. 中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志, 2022, 29(1): 17-21.
[10] 胡西西, 何远宏, 高灵通, 等. 多发性硬化患者治疗前后IL-17、IL-23、IL-27、TNF-α变化及与头颅MRI增强病灶数目的相关性探讨[J]. 实验与检验医学, 2023, 41(3): 363-366.
[11] 刘欣瑶, 苏磊, 张喆, 等. 7T超高场MRI对多发性硬化病灶的检出价值[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志, 2023, 26(6): 576-582.
[12] 方星威, 卢娅欣, 符永玫, 等. 复发缓解型多发性硬化复发风险与血清生化指标的关联[J]. 热带医学杂志, 2023, 23(5): 624-627, 662.
[13] 谢阳, 袁正洲, 刘梦兰, 等. 复发缓解型多发性硬化患者血清miR-326表达水平与NSE、MBP水平变化的关系[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2021, 37(17): 2134-2137.
[14] Aslam N, Khan IU, Bashamakh A, et al. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis using machine learning and deep learning: challenges and opportunities[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2022, 22(20): 7856.
[15] 严明生. 同步检测血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶和髓鞘碱性蛋白含量对脑梗死及多发性硬化鉴别诊断的价值[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2004, (3): 96-97.
文章导航

/

〈 〉