临床医学论著

血栓弹力图在双重血浆分子吸附和血浆置换联合治疗模式治疗慢加急性肝衰竭中的应用价值*

  • 马万龙 ,
  • 刘帅伟 ,
  • 刘惠娟 ,
  • 海龙 ,
  • 雒夏 ,
  • 张平 ,
  • 焦运 ,
  • 丁向春
展开
  • 宁夏医科大学总医院感染性疾病科,宁夏银川 750001
丁向春

收稿日期: 2024-12-17

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-12

基金资助

*2021年度北京肝胆相照公益基金会人工肝专项基金项目(RGGJJ-2021-024)

The thromboela-stography application value in the treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure by double plasma molecular adsorpiion system combined with plasma exchange

  • MA Wanlong ,
  • LIU Shuaiwei ,
  • LIU Huijuan ,
  • HAI Long ,
  • LUO Xia ,
  • ZHANG Ping ,
  • JIAO Yun ,
  • DING Xiangchun
Expand
  • Department of Infectious Diseases, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750001, China

Received date: 2024-12-17

  Online published: 2025-09-12

摘要

目的:评估采用血栓弹力图(thrombela-stograghy, TEG)对接受双重血浆分子吸附(double plasma molecular absorb system, DPMAS)联合血浆置换(plasmapheresis, PE)治疗的慢加急性肝衰竭(acute on chronic liver failure, ACLF)患者的凝血功能变化的监测效果。方法:选择2021年1月-2024年1月宁夏医科大学总医院收治的49例行DPMAS联合PE治疗的ACLF患者作为研究对象,在治疗前后进行TEG和常规凝血项目检测,收集患者的临床资料和凝血指标进行统计学分析。采用Pearson法评估TEG参数与常规凝血指标之间的相关性,并通过ROC曲线探讨TEG单项及联合参数对ACLF患者预后的预测能力。结果:与治疗前比较,DPMAS联合PE模式治疗ACLF患者的临床特征以及部分实验室指标之间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。TEG检测结果的R值减小,凝血指数显著升高(P=0.001);常规凝血参数凝血酶原时间(prothrombin time, PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(activated partial thromboplastin time, APTT)、国际标准化比值(international normalized ratio, INR)、血浆纤维蛋白原(plasma fibrinogen, FIB)在治疗后均有所改善,差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。相关性分析显示,TEG参数中R值与PT、APTT及INR呈显著正相关,而K值则与PLT和FIB呈显著负相关(P<0.05)。相较于单一TEG参数,联合检测在预后预测中的AUC更高(P<0.01),灵敏度为75.85%,特异度为92.17%。结论:TEG检测在反映DPMAS联合PE治疗ACLF患者的动态凝血状态优于常规凝血指标,且对ACLF患者预后具有较高的预测价值。

本文引用格式

马万龙 , 刘帅伟 , 刘惠娟 , 海龙 , 雒夏 , 张平 , 焦运 , 丁向春 . 血栓弹力图在双重血浆分子吸附和血浆置换联合治疗模式治疗慢加急性肝衰竭中的应用价值*[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2025 , 41(8) : 55 -60 . DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2025.08.010

Abstract

Objective: Assessment of thromboela-stography (TEG) as a monitoring approach for coagulation changes and as a predictor of treatment efficacy in the management of slowly progressive ACLF with DPMAS combined with PE. Methods: A total of forty-nine patients with slowly progressive acute liver failure treated with DPMAS combined with PE in the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University were collected. TEG and routine coagulation parameters were assessed before and after treatment, and relevant clinical data and coagulation indices,including prothrombin time(PT)、activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT)、international normalized ratio(INR)、plasma fibrinogen(FIB) were collected for statistical analysis. Pearson's method was applied to explore potential correlations between TEG-derived metrics and traditional coagulation indicators. In addition, ROC analysis was conducted to determine the capacity of TEG parameters, both alone and in combination, to predict clinical outcomes in ACLF patients. Results: Compared with pre-treatment levels, patients treated with DPMAS combined with PE showed significant improvements in clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators (P<0.05) . TEG test results showed a significant decrease in R-value and a significant increase in coagulation index (P=0.001); conventional coagulation tests PT, APTT, INR, and FIB indexes improved significantly, with statistical significance (all P<0.01). R was found to be positively linked to PT, APTT, and INR, while K showed a negative correlation with PLT and FIB, with all relationships reaching statistical significance (P<0.05). The AUC of TEG parameters for predicting patient prognosis was significantly higher than that of single-item evaluation(P<0.01), with a sensitivity of 75.85% and a specificity of 92.17%. Conclusion: In patients with ACLF receiving DPMAS combined with PE, dynamic coagulation profiles assessed by TEG were more reflective of clinical status than conventional indicators and exhibited superior predictive capability regarding outcomes.

参考文献

[1] Danpanichkul P, Kongarin S, Permpatdechakul S, et al. The surreptitious burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the elderly in the Asia-Pacific Region: an insight from the global burden of disease study 2019[J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(20): 6456.
[2] Younossi ZM, Wong G, Anstee QM, et al. The global burden of liver disease[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2023, 21(8): 1978-1991.
[3] 邹波, 朱龙川, 甘达凯, 等. 低置换量血浆置换术联合双重血浆分子吸附术治疗慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后的结果[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(3): 348-352.
[4] Wang L, Xu WX, Zhu S, et al. Double plasma molecular adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: a prospective study[J]. J Clin Transl Hepatol, 2023, 11(4): 908-917.
[5] Whitton TP, Healy WJ. Review of thromboelastography (TEG): medical and surgical applications[J]. Ther Adv Pulm Crit Care Med, 2023, 18: 29768675231208426.
[6] 蒋波笛, 孟祥红, 李瑞平. 血栓弹力图及传统凝血试验对肝移植术中用血的影响[J]. 实用器官移植电子杂志, 2023, 11(5): 441-446.
[7] 周黄燕, 吕赛平, 袁敏, 等. 肝病患者血栓弹力图与血常规及凝血功能检测指标的对比分析[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2023, 39(22): 3797-3801.
[8] 范晓棠. 慢加急性肝衰竭的定义, 诊断及治疗研究进展 [J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14: 4629.
[9] 刘晶雪, 李树臣. 不同评分模型对肝衰竭患者预后的预测能力及其研究进展[J]. 肝脏, 2023, 28(7): 857-861.
[10] 李顶春, 游晶, 李武. 肝衰竭患者预后预测研究进展[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2023, 26(4): 605-608.
[11] 林建辉, 陈丽霞, 蓝丽琴, 等. 人工肝血浆透析滤过干预启动时间与乙型肝炎相关性慢加急性肝衰竭患者院内预后之间的关联[J]. 中国血液净化, 2023, 22(3): 221-226.
[12] 周莉, 杨颜榕, 陈煜. 非生物型人工肝技术的优化与生物型人工肝研究进展[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40(2): 239-245.
[13] 张静, 周新民. 肝衰竭前期的人工肝治疗[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40(2): 229-232.
[14] Gaudefroy J, Brunet P, Lordier B, et al. Assessment of liver transplantation eligibility for ACLF patients[J]. J Liver Transplant, 2023, 11: 100167.
[15] Xiao LL, Chen JJ, Zhao S, et al. The 90-day survival threshold: a pivotal determinant of long-term prognosis in HBV-ACLF patients - insights from a prospective longitudinal cohort study[J]. Adv Sci, 2024, 11(16): e2304381.
[16] 李菲, 陈辛未, 李琦. HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者血清 GP73, suPAR 和 AT-Ⅲ 水平变化及其临床意义探讨 [J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2023, 26(6): 847-50.
[17] 魏鹂娴, 邵晨, 罗蕾蕾, 等. TEG/ROTEM对肝硬化静脉曲张出血患者出血量预测及指导备血的价值[J]. 肝脏, 2023, 28(11): 1301-1305.
[18] Ambulkar R, Baskar V, Patkar S, et al. Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection-a single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial) [J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2023, 67(12): 1077-1083.
[19] Bajwa RK, Kleb C, Faisal MS, et al. Thromboelastography characteristics in critically ill patients with liver disease[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 36(2): 190-196.
[20] Di Y, Li JL, Ye CJ, et al. Thromboelastography parameters in chronic viral liver disease and liver resection: a retrospective study[J]. Singapore Med J, 2024, 65(8): 438-443.
[21] Kim SM, Sohn CH, Kwon H, et al. Prognostic role of initial thromboelastography in emergency department patients with primary postpartum hemorrhage:association with massive transfusion [J]. J Pers Med. 2024, 14(4): 422.
[22] Xu WX, Zhu S, Yang L, et al. Safety and efficacy of double plasma molecular adsorption system with sequential low-volume plasma exchange in intermediate-stage hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. J Med Virol, 2023, 95(3): e28650.
[23] 王杏宝, 巫华志, 刘明, 等. 新型人工肝成功救治1例斑疹伤寒继发多器官功能障碍综合征[J]. 中国热带医学, 2023, 23(4): 431-434.
[24] 王璐, 许文雄, 朱姝, 等. 人工肝治疗HBV相关慢加急性肝衰竭的血小板计数变化及其影响因素[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38(5): 1053-1058.
[25] 张秀秀, 胡彦明, 汤汝佳, 等. DPMAS联合PE治疗中血浆吸附量影响因素分析[J]. 肝脏, 2023, 28(12): 1410-1412, 1422.
[26] 王彬彬, 刘岳青, 王鹏. 凝血指标与肝硬化患者肝功能分级的相关性研究[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2023, 39(5): 51-54, 67.
[27] 邓春荣, 范洪伟, 付克, 等. TEG对高出血风险肝硬化患者侵袭性操作前输注血液制品的指导价值[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2020, 25(2): 169-173.
[28] Rössler J, Li YF, Ott S, et al. Intrinsic or nonintrinsic end-stage liver disease and its association with thromboelastography-based coagulation states in patients undergoing liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2024, 38(10): 2368-2376.
文章导航

/