目的:通过对比布鲁氏菌病(又称布病)隐性感染者和急性布病患者职业、年龄、性别和试管凝集试验(SAT)抗体滴度的差异,了解布病隐性感染者基本情况,为预防和治疗布病提供基础信息。方法:采取完全随机抽样的方法选取锡盟地区2019年1月~12月依据《布鲁氏菌病诊断标准》确诊的急性布病患者164例和隐性布病感染者160例。患者年龄和经对数转换后的SAT滴度用两独立样本t检验比较;职业和性别用χ2检验比较。结果:两组职业进行比较(χ2=15.837,P<0.05),差异有统计学意义;两组年龄和SAT滴度比较均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),隐性感染者年龄低于急性布病组,抗体滴度高于急性布病患者;两组性别比较(χ2=0.018,P>0.05),差异无统计学意义。结论:布病感染状况可能与职业、年龄、SAT抗体滴度有关。
Objective: To investigate the differences in the occupation, age, gender and serum agglutination test (SAT) antibody titers between asymptomatic Brucellosis cases and acute Brucellosis cases, with the purpose of providing basic information to the prevention and treatment of Brucellosis. Methods: Using a completely random sampling method, 164 acute brucellosis patients and 160 latent brucellosis infections diagnosed according to the "Diagnostic Criteria for Brucellosis" in the Ximeng region from January to December 2019 were selected as the research subjects.Compare the patient's age and SAT titers after logarithmic transformation using two independent sample t-tests; Compare occupation and gender using χ2 test.Results: Comparison of occupation between the two groups of patients, the differences were statistically significant (χ2=15.837, P<0.05). Comparison of age and SAT titer in the two groups, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Patients with asymptomatic Brucellosis were younger than acute Brucellosis cases, and the SAT titer of symptomatic Brucellosis cases was higher than acute Brucellosis cases. There was no significant difference in gender between the two groups of patients (χ2=0.018, P>0.05). Conclusion: The infection status of brucellosis may be related to occupation, age, and SAT antibody titers.
[1] 何毅刚, 戴沛军, 王楠, 等. 布鲁氏菌病隐性感染者临床特征分析[J]. 中华地方病学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 401-404.
[2] Mangalgi SS, Sajjan AG, Mohite ST, et al. Brucellosis in occupationally exposed groups[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016, 10(4): 24-27.
[3] 常殊杰, 金福芝, 殷文武, 等. 齐齐哈尔市梅里斯区布鲁氏菌病感染危险因素调查分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2011, 26(2): 133-135.
[4] 刘东艳, 王勇, 张闻洋, 等. 2010-2019 年内蒙古自治区呼伦贝尔市高危人群布鲁氏菌病流行及知晓情况调查[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(7): 672-677.
[5] Hu J, Zhang XY, Yang HX, et al. Brucellosis screening and follow-up of seropositive asymptomatic subjects among household members of shepherds in China[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2021, 40(6): 1325-1328.
[6] 国家卫生健康委员会. WS/T 269-2019布鲁氏菌病诊断[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019.
[7] 刘佳音, 姜海. 我国布鲁氏菌病诊断方法应用及思考[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2021, 42(1): 160-163.
[8] 免疫学检验血清滴度数据统计处理问题探讨[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2000, 10(3): 368-369.
[9] 何毅刚, 戴沛军, 王楠, 等. 布鲁氏菌病隐性感染者临床特征分析[J]. 中华地方病学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 401-404.
[10] 李华根. 布病血清学检测对布病的诊断价值探讨[J]. 中国实用医药, 2022, 17(3): 116-118.
[11] 马恒之, 温都苏, 周红菊, 等. 羊型布鲁氏菌病患者血清中IgM、IgA和IgG型抗体的分析[J]. 中华微生物学和免疫学杂志, 1982, 2(3): 182-185.
[12] Xu NN, Dong XM, Yao YY, et al. Improved early detection of focal brucellosis complications with anti- brucella IgG[J]. Clin Microbiol, 2020, 58(10): e00903-20.