目的: 探讨个体化疼痛护理对全膝关节置换术后患者疼痛及满意度的影响。方法: 选择2016年8月至2017年4月接受全膝关节置换术的160例患者为研究对象,依据护理方式的不同分为观察组和对照组,各80例。对照组术后给予常规护理,观察组在对照组基础上增加个体化疼痛护理干预,比较两组患者疼痛评分及护理满意度。结果: 观察组中患者疼痛程度优于对照组(P＜0.05);护理后,观察组满意度评分(151.60±23.48)分高于对照组(127.92±20.83)分(P＜0.05)。结论: 个体化疼痛护理可减轻全膝关节置换术后患者疼痛程度,提高患者满意度。
Objective: To explore the influence of individualized pain care on pain and satisfaction in patients after total knee replacement.Methods: 160 cases of patients after total knee replacement from August 2016 to April 2017 were selected and divided into observation group and control group according to the different nursing methods (n=80). The control group was given routine nursing after operation, and the observation group was given individualized pain care on the basis of the control group. The pain score and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared.Results: The degree of pain in the observation group was better than that in the control group (P＜0.05). After nursing, the satisfaction degree (151.60±23.48) in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (127.92±20.83) (P＜0.05).Conclusion: Individualized pain care can reduce the pain level after total knee replacement and improve the patients' satisfaction.
[1] 张玲,崔玉洁,段玉莲,等.个体化疼痛护理对全膝关节置换术患者的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2016,13(14):38-39.
[2] 贺静,魏威.护理干预对人工全膝关节置换术后疼痛及满意度的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(18):206-207.
[3] 李美萍.综合护理干预对全膝关节置换术后疼痛及护理工作满意度影响[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2015,47(6):761-762.
[4] Li J, Deng X, Jiang T. Combined femoral and sciatic nerve block versus femoral and local infiltration anesthesia for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2016,11(1):158.
[5] 田义华,陈洁,唐永利.全膝关节置换术后患者对多模式镇痛的满意度现状研究[J].中国实用护理杂志,2015,31(28):2123-2127.
[6] 赵红光.护理工作量与质量综合评价体系的研究[D].湖北:华中科技大学,2008:23-25.
[7] 汪萍.疼痛教育对全膝关节置换术后疼痛患者镇痛疗效及护理满意度的影响[J].中国医疗前沿,2013,8(1):101.
