临床医学论著

超声引导下腹腔神经丛毁损治疗癌性上腹痛的效果

  • 张宇 ,
  • 双丽 ,
  • 布仁吉雅 ,
  • 苗淑芳 ,
  • 布和 ,
  • 张凯琴 ,
  • 亲德门 ,
  • 潘小平
展开
  • 1.包头医学院研究生院,内蒙古包头 014040;
    2.内蒙古国际蒙医医院肿瘤介入血管外科;
    3.内蒙古国际蒙医医院检验科;
    4.内蒙古国际蒙医医院蒙医肿瘤科

收稿日期: 2023-05-16

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-18

Effect of ultrasound-guided celiac plexus lesion in the treatment of cancerous upper abdominal pain

  • ZHANG Yu ,
  • SHUANG Li ,
  • Burenjiya ,
  • MIAO Shufang ,
  • BU He ,
  • ZHANG Kaiqin ,
  • Qindemen ,
  • PAN Xiaoping
Expand
  • 1. Postgraduate School of Baotou Medical College, Baotou 014040, China;
    2. Tumor Interventional Vascular Surgery Department of Inner Mongolia International Mongolian Medical Hospital;
    3. Laboratory Department of Inner Mongolia International Mongolian Medical Hospital;
    4. Mongolian Cancer Department of Inner Mongolia International Mongolian Medical Hospital

Received date: 2023-05-16

  Online published: 2023-12-18

摘要

目的: 观察超声引导下腹腔神经丛毁损(CPN)治疗前、后镇痛的效果、及血浆白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)整体含量及与疼痛度的相关关系。方法: 对49例经三阶梯药物镇痛后仍未缓解的顽固上腹痛病患,在超声引导下行CPN,观察不良反应,统计CPN治疗前和治疗后1 d、3 d、1周、1个月病患疼痛度,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估疼痛度,并采集治疗前及治疗后72 h空腹静脉血,用ELISA法测定IL-1β及TNF-α含量。结果: (1)治疗后49例病患VAS评分显著低于治疗前(P<0.001);(2)治疗后病患血浆IL-1β、TNF-α含量均显著低于治疗前(P<0.001);(3)治疗前及治疗后72 h,病患血浆IL-1β、TNF-α含量与VAS评分之间呈正相关(r=0.750、r=0.748,P<0.001);(4)治疗期间未出现严重并发症。仅有5例出现穿刺部位疼痛,24 h后缓解;13例出现腹泻;10例发生恶心、呕吐;8例出现术后低血压。结论: 超声引导下CPN便利、安全、有效,近期镇痛效果好,可成为介入治疗上腹部癌痛的手段。患者血浆IL-1β、TNF-α含量与VAS呈显著正相关,可用作疼痛严重度及辅助评估疼痛改变的关键指标。

本文引用格式

张宇 , 双丽 , 布仁吉雅 , 苗淑芳 , 布和 , 张凯琴 , 亲德门 , 潘小平 . 超声引导下腹腔神经丛毁损治疗癌性上腹痛的效果[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2023 , 39(12) : 76 -81 . DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2023.12.015

Abstract

Objective: To observe the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided celiac plexus lesion (CPN) before and after treatment and the overall content of plasma interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and their correlation with pain degree. Methods: Forty-nine patients with intractable upper abdominal pain who had not been relieved after three-step drug analgesia were treated with ultrasound-guided CPN. The adverse reactions were observed. The pain degree of patients before and 1 day, 3 days, 1 week and 1 month after CPN treatment was counted. The pain degree was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Fasting venous blood was collected before and 72 hours after treatment, and the contents of IL-1β and TNF-α were determined by ELISA. Results: (1)The VAS score of 49 patients after treatment was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.001); (2)The levels of plasma IL-1β and TNF-α after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.001); (3) There was a positive correlation between plasma IL-1β, TNF-α levels and VAS scores before treatment and 72 hours after treatment (r=0.750, r=0.748, P<0.001); (4) No serious complications occurred during the treatment, only 5 patients had pain at the puncture site, which was relieved 24 hours later; 13 patients had diarrhea; 10 patients had nausea and vomiting; 8 patients had hypotension after treatment. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided CPN is convenient, safe and effective, and has good short-term analgesic effect. Meanwhile, it can be used as a means of interventional therapy for upper abdominal cancer pain. The levels of plasma IL-1β and TNF-α of patients are significantly positively correlated with VAS, which can be used as key indicators for pain severity and auxiliary evaluation of pain changes.

参考文献

[1] Aman MM, Mahmoud A, Deer T, et al. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) best practices and guidelines for the interventional management of cancer-associated pain[J].J Pain Res,2021,16(14):2139-2164.
[2] Wilson J, Stack C, Hester J. Recent advances in cancer painmanagement[J].F1000 Prime Rep,2014,3(6):10.
[3] Ashlock K.Celiac Plexus Block: Management of abdominal pain in patients with late-stage cancer[J].Clin J Oncol Nurs,2018,22(6):663-665.
[4] Neuwersch-Sommeregger S, Köstenberger M, Stettner H, et al. Computed tomography-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis in palliative in-patients with intra-abdominal malignancy: retrospective evaluation of neurolytic solution spread as a predictive factor[J].Pain Ther,2022,11(4):1229-1243.
[5] Jin G, Qiu X, Ding M, et al. Navigated magnetic resonance imaging-guided celiac plexus neurolysis using an open magnetic resonance system for pancreatic cancer patients with upper abdominal pain[J].J Cancer Res Ther,2019,15(4):825-830.
[6] Wyse JM, Battat R, Sun S, et al. Practice guidelines for endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis[J].Endosc Ultrasound,2017,6(6):369-375.
[7] Bhatnagar S, Thulkar S, Dhamija E, et al. Evaluation of outcomes of ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis using immediate post procedure computed tomography: An observational study[J].Indian J Gastroenterol,2017,36(4):282-288.
[8] 吕秋兰,黄安,刘双梅,等. 促炎因子和抗炎因子在神经病理痛中的作用[J].神经解剖学杂志,2015,31(4):533-538.
[9] 陆向荣,王枫,魏金荣,等. 鞘内注射肿瘤坏死因子-α单克隆抗体缓解大鼠骨癌痛的机制[J].江苏大学学报(医学版),2015,25(1):33-37.
[10] Urits I, Jones MR, Orhurhu V, et al. A comprehensive review of the celiac plexus block for the management of chronic abdominal pain[J].Curr Pain Headache Rep,2020, 24(8):42.
[11] Minaga K, Takenaka M, Kamata K, et al. Alleviating pancreatic cancer-associated pain using endoscopic ultrasound-guided neurolysis[J].Cancers (Basel),2018,10(2):50.
[12] Kambadakone A, Thabet A, Gervais DA,et al. CT-guided celiac plexus neurolysis: a review of anatomy, indications, technique, and tips for successful treatment[J].Radiographics,2011,31(6):1599-621.
[13] 计忠伟,刘文龙,茹彬,等. CT引导下经皮穿刺内脏大小神经毁损术治疗晚期胰腺癌疼痛[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2019,16(4):207-210.
[14] 张宇,潘小平. 超声介入技术在治疗癌性疼痛中的临床应用进展[J].微创医学,2022,17(2):207-210,214.
[15] Bhatnagar S, Joshi S, Rana SP, et al. Bedside ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in upper abdominal cancer patients: a randomized, prospective study for comparison of percutaneous bilateral paramedian vs.unilateral paramedian needle-insertion technique[J].Pain Pract,2014,14(2):E63-8.
[16] Abdelbaser I, Shams T, El-Giedy AA, et al. Direct intraoperative versus percutaneous computed tomographyguided celiac plexus neurolysis in non-resectable pancreatic cancer: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study[J].Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed),2022,69(2):71-78.
[17] Zhong W, Yu Z, Zeng JX, et al. Celiac plexus block for treatment of pain associated with pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis[J].Pain Pract,2014,14(1):43-51.
[18] 易晓彬,鄢建勤. 微创介入疗法是癌痛治疗的有效方法[J].中华医学杂志,2010,90(39):2737-2739.
[19] 谢广伦,郭大鹏,刘畅,等. 腹腔神经丛毁损单独或联合腹膜后转移淋巴结注射治疗胰腺癌相关疼痛的效果比较[J].中华医学杂志,2020,100(5):357-362.
[20] Mao Y, Wang C, Tian X, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress contributes to nociception via neuroinflammation in a murine bone cancer pain model[J].Anesthesiology,2020,132(2):357-372.
[21] An K, Rong H, Ni H,et al. Spinal PKC activation - Induced neuronal HMGB1 translocation contributes to hyperalgesia in a bone cancer pain model in rats[J].Exp Neurol,2018,303:80-94.
[22] 吴艺舟,林子晨,孙杰. 基于肿瘤坏死因子TNF-α的癌症疼痛机制及临床治疗策略[J].医学理论与实践,2018,31(18):2716-2719.
[23] Daoust R, Sirois MJ, Lee JS, et al. Painful memories: reliability of pain intensity recall at 3 months in senior patients[J].Pain Res Manag,2017,2017(10):5983721.
[24] Xu M, Ni H, Xu L, et al.B14 ameliorates bone cancer pain through downregulating spinal interleukin-1β via suppressing neuron JAK2/STAT3 pathway[J].Mol Pain,2019,15:1744806919886498.
文章导航

/