重大疾病防治专栏

超声检测多部位内脏脂肪与颈动脉粥样硬化相关性的初步研究

  • 赵田英 ,
  • 赵亚子 ,
  • 石紫旋 ,
  • 申晴 ,
  • 张霞
展开
  • 皖南医学院第一附属医院弋矶山医院超声医学科,安徽芜湖 241001

收稿日期: 2022-11-11

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-22

A preliminary study of the correlation between ultrasound detection of multi-site visceral fat and atherosclerosis

  • ZHAO Tianying ,
  • ZHAO Yazi ,
  • SHI Zixuan ,
  • SHEN Qing ,
  • ZHANG Xia
Expand
  • Department of Ultrasound Medicine of Yijishan Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241001, China

Received date: 2022-11-11

  Online published: 2023-09-22

摘要

目的:应用超声检测多部位内脏脂肪与颈动脉粥样硬化的关系,期待寻找出更多可能影响动脉粥样硬化的指标,从而帮助临床医生更加准确地评估心脑血管疾病。方法:选取2021年6月-2022年3月在皖南医学院弋矶山医院超声科确诊为颈动脉粥样硬化(carotid atherosclerosis, CAS)的患者95例及健康志愿者39例。将患者按照内膜-中膜厚度(intima-media thickness, IMT)分为IMT ≤0.9 mm组和IMT >0.9 mm组,测量多个部位内脏脂肪参数,并进行比较。结果:两组心外膜脂肪组织(epicardial adipose tissue,EAT)、皮下脂肪厚度(subcutaneous fat thickness,SCFT)、腹膜前脂肪厚度(preperitoneal fat thickness, PPFT)、内脏脂肪厚度(visceral fat thickness, VFT)、右肾后周脂肪厚度(posterior right perinephric fat thickness, PRPFT)、VFT/SCFT、内脏脂肪体积(visceral adipose tissue, VAT)及左右肾脂肪囊厚度相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素logistic回归分析发现,EAT、PPFT、VFT、PRPFT及右肾脂肪囊值越大患CAS的风险越高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),在调整了多变量后再进行分析,差异仍然有统计学意义(P<0.05);ROC曲线分析确定VFT、PRPFT的AUC值分别为0.943、0.843,有较高的敏感性,确定其临界值分别为6.25 mm、59.45 mm。结论:内脏脂肪与CAS有关,EAT、PPFT、VFT、PRPFT及右肾脂肪囊均是CAS的独立影响因素,其中PRPFT、VFT诊断效能好。

本文引用格式

赵田英 , 赵亚子 , 石紫旋 , 申晴 , 张霞 . 超声检测多部位内脏脂肪与颈动脉粥样硬化相关性的初步研究[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2023 , 39(9) : 64 -69 . DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2023.09.013

Abstract

Objective: To study the correlation between ultrasound detection of multi-site visceral fat and atherosclerosis, with the purpose to find more indicators that may affect atherosclerosis, so as to help clinicians evaluate cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases more accurately. Methods: From June 2021 to March 2022, 95 patients who were diagnosed with Carotid Atherosclerosis (CAS) in the Ultrasound Department of Yijishan Hospital, Anhui South Medical College, and 39 healthy volunteers were selected as the research objects. All research objects were grouped into the IMT ≤0.9mm group and the IMT >0.9mm group according to the intima-media thickness (IMT). Visceral fat parameters in multiple sites of the two groups were measured and compared. Results: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), subcutaneous fat thickness (SCFT), preperitoneal fat thickness (PPFT), visceral fat thickness (VFT), the difference in right perineal periphery fat thickness (PRPFT), VFT/SCFT, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and left and right renal fat sac thickness of the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis found that the larger the value of EAT, PPFT, VFT, PRPFT, VFT/SCFT and right renal fat sac, the higher the risk of CAS, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), and the difference was still statistically significant after adjusting the multivariate(P<0.05). ROC curve analysis determined that the AUC values of VFT and PRPFT were 0.943 and 0.843 respectively, which had high sensitivity, and the critical values were 6.25mm and 59.45mm respectively. Conclusion: Visceral fat is related to CAS, while EAT, PPFT, VFT, PRPFT and right kidney fat sac thickness are independent influencing factors of CAS, among which PRPFT and VFT have good diagnostic efficacy.

参考文献

[1] Haberka M,Skilton M,Biedron M,et al. Obesity,visceral adiposity and carotid atherosclerosis[J].J Diabetes Complications,2019,33(4): 302-306.
[2] 吴后祎,马领松. NLR预测TIA颈动脉斑块稳定性的可行性研究[J].右江民族医学院学报,2021,43(2): 206-209.
[3] Li Y,Zhao D,Wang M,et al. Association of menopause with risk of carotid artery atherosclerosis[J].Maturitas,2021,143: 171-177.
[4] Neeland IJ,Ross R,Despres JP,et al. International atherosclerosis society; international chair on cardiometabolic risk working group on visceral obesity,visceral and ectopic fat,atherosclerosis,and cardiometabolic disease: a position statement[J].Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol,2019,7(9): 715-725.
[5] Jung CH,Kim BY,Kim KJ,et al. Contribution of subcutaneous abdominal fat on ultrasonography to carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J].Cardiovasc Diabetol,2014,28(13): 67.
[6] Williams B,Mancia G,Spiering W,et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension[J].Eur Heart J,2018,39: 3021-3104.
[7] Rallidis LS,Baroutsi K,Zolindaki M,et al. Visceral adipose tissue is a better predictor of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis compared with waist circumference[J].Ultrasound Med Biol,2014,40(6): 1083-1088.
[8] Roever LS,Resende ES,Diniz AL,et al. Abdominal obesity and association with atherosclerosis risk factors: the Uberlandia Heart Study[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2016,95: 1357.
[9] Hirooka M,Kumagi T,Kurose K,et al. A technique for the measurement of visceral fat by ultrasonography: comparison of measurements by ultrasonography and computed tomography[J].Intern Med,2005,44(8): 794-799.
[10] Parisi V,Petraglia L,Formisano R,et al. Validation of the echocardiographic assessment of epicardial adipose tissue thickness at the rindfleisch fold for the prediction of coronary artery disease[J].Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis,2020,30(1): 99-105.
[11] Lear SA,Humphries KH,Kohli S,et al. Visceral adipose tissue,a potential risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis: results of the Multicultural Community Health Assessment Trial (M-CHAT)[J].Stroke,2007,38(9): 2422-9.
[12] Tanaka T,Kishi S,Ninomiya K,et al. Impact of abdominal fat distribution,visceral fat,and subcutaneous fat on coronary plaque scores assessed by 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography[J].Atherosclerosis,2019,287: 155-161.
[13] Erdoğan T,Durakoğlugil ME,Çetin M,et al. Epicardial adipose tissue predicts carotid intima-media thickness independently of body mass index and waist circumference[J].Acta Cardiol Sin,2019,35(1): 32-41.
[14] Iacobellis G,Willens HJ. Echocardiographic epicardial fat: a review of research and clinical applications[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2009,2(12): 1311-9.
[15] Hazem M,Elsamman M,Bazeed S,et al. Noninvasive prediction of carotid artery atherosclerosis by multiple abdominal fat indices measured via ultrasonography[J].Ultrasonography,2021,40(3): 366-377.
[16] De Pergola G,Campobasso N,Nardecchia A,et al. Para- and perirenal ultrasonographic fat thickness is associated with 24-hours mean diastolic blood pressure levels in overweight and obese subjects[J].BMC Cardiovasc Disord,2015,30(15): 108.
[17] Liu BX,Sun W,Kong XQ. Perirenal fat:a unique fat pad and potential target for cardiovascular disease[J].Angiology,2019,70(7): 584-593.
[18] Kim SK,Kim HJ,Hur KY,et al. Visceral fat thickness measured by ultrasonography can estimate not only visceral obesity but also risks of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases[J].Am J Clin Nutr,2004,79(4): 593-9.
[19] Lim S,Quon MJ,Koh KK. Modulation of adiponectin as a potential therapeutic strategy[J].Atherosclerosis,2014,233(2): 721-728.
[20] Nonterah EA,Bots ML,Oduro A,et al. Adiposity phenotypes and subclinical atherosclerosis in adults from sub-saharan africa: an H3africa AWI-Gen study[J].Glob Heart,2021,16(1): 19.
[21] 焦敏,徐凯. CT腹部脂肪定量与颈动脉粥样硬化的相关性研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2022,41(4): 736-740.
[22] Colonetti T,Grande AJ,Amaral MC,et al. Effect of exercise on epicardial adipose tissue in adults: a systematic review and meta-analyses[J].Heart Fail Rev,2021,6(6): 1399-1411.
文章导航

/