目的: 探讨双管引流(末端回肠置管外引流及肛管引流)在合并吻合口漏高危因素的低位直肠前切除术中的应用价值。方法: 回顾性分析2020年5月至2021年2月,收治于蚌埠医学院第一附属医院胃肠外科合并有吻合口漏高危因素且顺利施行腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术的直肠癌患者资料。患者中观察组27例,行腹腔镜低位直肠前切除术,术中加行双管引流;对照组29例,行腹腔镜低位直肠前切除+预防性末端回肠造口术。对比分析两组患者的基线情况,以手术时间,术后排气时间、进食时间,术后住院时长、并发症发生率等作为术后评价指标,比较两种手术方式的优劣,探讨双管引流用于替代末端回肠造口的安全性及可行性。结果: 两组患者均手术过程顺利,术前基线对比差异无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05);观察组手术时间为(146.92±19.85)min,较对照组(123.44±10.41)min延长(P＜0.05);两组患者在术后排气、进食时间(2.41±0.52 d∶2.78±0.66 d)、术后住院时长(7.65±2.57 d∶7.59±1.83 d)及术后并发症发生率(18.52 %∶17.24 %)、术后疼痛不适等指标对比中,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论: 双管引流安全可靠,可期替代预防性造口用于治疗合并有吻合口漏高危因素的低位直肠癌患者。
Objective: To investigate the application value of double tube drainage (external drainage of terminal ileum and anal tube drainage) in low anterior rectal resection with high risk factors of anastomotic leak. Methods: The data of rectal cancer patients who were admitted to the gastrointestinal surgery from May 2020 to February 2021 with high risk factors of anastomotic leak and successfully underwent laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection were retrospectively analyzed. Among these cases, 27 cases in the observation group underwent laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection with double tube drainage; in the control group, 29 cases underwent laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection and prophylactic terminal ileostomy. The baseline conditions of the two groups were compared and analyzed; the time required for operation, postoperative exhaust time, eating time, postoperative hospitalization time and complication rate were used as evaluation indexes to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical methods, and to explore the safety and feasibility of double tube drainage instead of prophylactic ileostomy. Results: All patients in the two groups had a smooth operation process, and there was no significant difference in preoperative baseline (all P values > 0.05). The operation time in the observation group (146.92±19.85min) was longer than that in the control group(123.44±10.41min)(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative exhaust, eating time (2.41±0.52d: 2.78±0.66d), postoperative hospitalization time (7.65 ± 2.57d: 7.59 ± 1.83d), complication rate (18.52 %: 17.24 %), and postoperative pain and discomfort between the two groups (P＞0.05). Conclusion: Double tube drainage is safe and reliable. It is hopeful to replace prophylactic terminal ileostomy in the treatment of low rectal cancer with high risk factors of anastomotic leak.
[1] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 2016年中国卫生和计划生育统计年鉴[M].中国协和医科大学出版社,2016.
[2] 刘晓雪,宇传华, 周薇,等. 中国近30年间结直肠癌死亡趋势分析[J].中国癌症杂志, 2018(3):177-183.
[3] Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2015[J].CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2015, 65(2):87-108.
[4] 徐忠法,甄亚男. 中国结直肠癌防控策略思考[J].结直肠肛门外科,2019,25(6):629-634.
[5] 韩加刚,王振军. 低位直肠癌相关神经解剖.中华外科杂志,2020,58(2):157-160.
[6] 李俊,王今,金岚,等. 直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏及其影响因素分析的多中心回顾性研究(附1243例报告)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2020,019(003):284-289.
[7] Pisarska M, Gajewska N, Małczak P, et al. Defunctioning ileostomy reduces leakage rate in rectal cancer surgery - systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Oncotarget, 2018, 9(29):20816-20825.
[8] Iwamoto M, Kawada K, Hida K, et al. Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review[J].World J Surg Onc, 2017, 15(1):143-148.
[9] 裴炜,王锡山. 低位直肠癌保肛术预防性回肠造口若干问题探讨[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2017, 6(005):373-376.
[10] Kuryba AJ, Scott NA, Hill J, et al. Determinants of stoma reversal in rectal cancer patients who had an anterior resection between 2009 and 2012 in the English National Health Service[J].Colorectal Dis, 2016, 18(6):O199-O205.
[11] 朱晓明,张卫. 低位直肠癌切除术后影响功能因素分析及对策[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 008(003):221-226.
[12] Lee SY, Kim CH, Kim YJ, et al. Impact of anal decompression on anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2015, 400(7):791-796.
[13] Frouws MA, Snijders HS, Malm SH, et al. Clinical relevance of a grading system for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection: analysis from a national cohort database[J].Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(7):706-713.
[14] 陈朝乾,张宗兵,左芦根,等. 405例直肠癌术后吻合口瘘的影响因素分析.包头医学院学报,2018,34(4):33-35.
[15] 舒宁波,徐建华,段小涛,等. 直肠癌Dixon术后吻合口漏相关危险因素分析[J].中国现代手术学杂志, 2020, v.24(01):41-45.
[16] 吴向欣,崔滨滨. 留置肛管与保护性造口预防直肠癌术后吻合口瘘的现状与进展[J].现代肿瘤医学, 2019, 27(11):180-183.
[17] Kawada K, Takahashi R, Hida K,et al. Impact of transanal drainage tube on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection[J].Int J Colorectal Dis,2018,33 (3):337-340.
[18] 李兴旺, 胡军红. 直肠癌术后前切除综合征的研究进展[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 008(002):170-175.
[19] 尤书萍,官云. 直肠癌保肛术后肛门功能评价及综合治疗促进肛门功能康复的研究.安徽医药,2018,22(9):1747-1751.
