临床医学论著

手术与非手术治疗缓解粉碎/节段型肋骨骨折疼痛效果对比*

  • 林可立 ,
  • 姜天烁 ,
  • 苏志勇
展开
  • 1.内蒙古科技大学包头医学院,内蒙古包头 014040;
    2.赤峰学院附属医院 赤峰学院胸部创伤与肿瘤研究所

收稿日期: 2022-05-05

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-07

基金资助

*内蒙古自治区高等学校科学研究项目(NJZY18218)

A comparison of pain relief effects on surgical and non-surgical treatments for comminuted or segmental rib fractures

  • LIN Keli ,
  • JIANG Tianshuo ,
  • SU Zhiyong
Expand
  • 1. Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014040, China;
    2. Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University,Institute of Thoracic Trauma and Oncology

Received date: 2022-05-05

  Online published: 2023-03-07

摘要

目的: 对比手术与非手术治疗缓解粉碎/节段型肋骨骨折疼痛的效果。方法: 选择2014年1月1日-2020年12月31日赤峰学院附属医院收治的肋骨骨折患者51例,按简单随机抽样方法分为手术组20例与非手术组31例并进行为期1年的三种状态下(静息时、咳嗽时、改变体位时)疼痛随访,最后对两组疼痛数据进行统计分析。结果: 手术组与非手术组粉碎/节段型肋骨骨折患者的疼痛差异主要表现在伤后第1个月内以及伤后第6-12个月,在伤后第1个月内手术治疗缓解疼痛效果明显优于非手术治疗(P<0.05);在伤后第6-12个月虽然统计结果显示非手术组患者疼痛程度低于手术组,但两组患者在此期间的疼痛程度集中趋势均已可忽略不计(VAS接近于0分)。结论: 对于粉碎/节段型肋骨骨折患者,在缓解疼痛方面,手术治疗的干预效果在伤后早期相比于非手术治疗更为明显,但疼痛并非肋骨骨折手术的独立适应证,其疼痛治疗方案应结合患者整体病情决定;伤后第6个月可能是肋骨骨折疼痛的一个重要分水岭。

本文引用格式

林可立 , 姜天烁 , 苏志勇 . 手术与非手术治疗缓解粉碎/节段型肋骨骨折疼痛效果对比*[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2023 , 39(1) : 35 -40 . DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2023.01.008

Abstract

Objective: To compare the pain relief effect on surgical and non-surgical treatment for comminuted/segmental rib fractures. Methods: 51 patients with rib fractures who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2020 were selected into this study. All selected patients were divided into the operation group and non-operation group with simple random sampling method. 1 year follow-up under three states (resting, coughing and body position changing) was performed to collect pain data. Finally, the pain data of the two groups of patients were statistically analyzed. Results: The pain difference between the operation group and the non-operation group was mainly reacted in the first month after fracture and the sixth to twelfth months after fracture. The pain relief effect of operation group within the first month after fracture was significantly better than that of the non-operation group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). From the sixth month to the twelfth month after fracture, although the statistical results showed that the pain degree of patients in the non-operation group was lower than that in the operation group, the central tendency of pain degree in the two groups during this period had reached a negligible level (close to 0 score). Conclusion: For patients with comminuted or segmental rib fractures, the intervention effect of operative treatment is better than that of non-operation treatment in the early stage after fracture, but pain is not an independent indication in rib fracture surgery, and its pain management plan should be determined by the overall condition of the patient.The sixth month after fracture may be an important watershed for rib fracture pain.

参考文献

[1] Senekjian L, Nirula R. Rib fracture fixation: indications and outcomes[J]. Crit Care Clin, 2017, 33(1): 153-165.
[2] Kasotakis G, Hasenboehler EA, Streib EW, et al. Operative fixation of rib fractures after blunt trauma: : A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2017, 82(3): 618-626.
[3] Dorman JR, Clarke P, Simpson RB, et al. Testing the clinical validity of the Bemelman Rib Fracture Management Guideline[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2020, 30(4): 597-599.
[4] de Campos J, White TW. Chest wall stabilization in trauma patients: why, when, and how [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(8): 951-962.
[5] Bemelman M, de Kruijf MW, van Baal M, et al. Rib fractures: to fix or not to fix? an evidence-based algorithm[J]. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017, 50(4): 229-234.
[6] Pieracci FM, Majercik S, Ali-Osman F, et al. Consensus statement: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures rib fracture colloquium clinical practice guidelines[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(2): 307-321.
[7] He Z, Zhang D, Xiao H, et al. The ideal methods for the management of rib fractures[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(8): 1078-1089.
[8] Marasco SF, Martin K, Niggemeyer L, et al. Impact of rib fixation on quality of life after major trauma with multiple rib fractures[J]. Injury, 2019, 50(1): 119-124.
[9] Fabricant L, Ham B, Mullins R, et al. Prolonged pain and disability are common after rib fractures[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 205(5): 511-515.
[10] Fagevik Olsén M, Slobo M, Klarin L, et al. Physical function and pain after surgical or conservative management of multiple rib fractures - a follow-up study[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2016, 24(1): 128.
[11] 苏志勇, 吴骏, 乔贵宾, 等. 胸部创伤治疗学[M].北京: 科学出版社, 2018: 82-265.
[12] 徐城, 杨晓秋, 刘丹彦. 常用的疼痛评估方法在临床疼痛评估中的作用[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2015, 03: 210-212.
[13] 张艳, 吴静. 护理干预对于肋骨骨折非手术患者疼痛的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2012, 16: 111-112.
[14] 宁琴荣, 陈玲, 欧阳卫, 等. 个性化疼痛管理对胸部外伤患者疼痛干预的效果观察[J]. 中国医学创新, 2016, 19: 87-90.
[15] 张鉴豪, 李杰, 伍火志. 胸腔镜辅助肋骨骨折内固定术的研究进展[J]. 新医学, 2017, 48(11): 761-764.
[16] Pieracci FM, Johnson JL, Stovall RT, et al. Completely thoracoscopic, intra-pleural reduction and fixation of severe rib fractures[J]. Trauma Case Rep, 2015, 1(5-8): 39-43.
[17] 苏志勇, 张镱镭, 魏峰, 等. SU's全胸腔镜下肋骨骨折骨板骨钉胸腔内植入固定技术的临床应用[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2013, 20(3): 362-364.
[18] Xia H, Zhu D, Li J, et al. Current status and research progress of minimally invasive surgery for flail chest[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2020, 19(1): 421-427.
[19] Li Y, Gao E, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2020, 12(7): 3706-3714.
文章导航

/