临床医学论著

腹腔镜子宫动脉暂时阻断在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊治疗效探讨

  • LIU Qiongfen ,
  • SHENG Xiujie ,
  • LYU Yongge ,
  • KE Yan ,
  • SHEN Lin ,
  • WANG Yan
展开
  • 1.深圳市中西医结合医院妇科,广东深圳 518104;
    2.广州医科大学第三附属医院妇科

收稿日期: 2021-09-07

  网络出版日期: 2022-09-09

Clinical study of laparoscopic uterine artery temporarily block in cesarean pregnancy

  • 刘琼芬 ,
  • 生秀杰 ,
  • 吕永革 ,
  • 沈琳 ,
  • 王炎
Expand
  • 1. Department of Gynecology, Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Shenzhen 518104, China;
    2. Department of Gynecology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Received date: 2021-09-07

  Online published: 2022-09-09

摘要

目的:研究子宫动脉暂时阻断在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊治疗效。方法:选取60例深圳市中西医结合医院2019年5月-2021年5月所收治的均经阴道超声考虑剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(cesarean scar pregnancy ,CSP),采用随机数字表法将其分实验组与对照组各30例。其中腹腔镜下子宫动脉暂时阻断后行剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶去除术组为实验组,行子宫动脉栓塞后行腹腔镜下剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶去除术组为对照组,比较两组患者治疗成功率、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、不良反应,术后3个月子宫内膜厚度及子宫内膜血运。结果:实验组和对照组住院时间分别为(7.3±3.3)d、(8.9±4.2)d;住院费用为(13 566.3±1 967.2)元、 (19 250.6±1 639.5)元;治疗不良反应发生率分别为:16.7 %、56.7 %;术后3个月子宫内膜厚度分别为(8.2±1.4)mm、(6.3±1.6)mm;以上比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者治疗成功率分别为:97.6 %;95.9 %;手术时间分别为(94.7±15.2)min、(101.3±17.4)min;术中出血量分别为(125.3±35.2)mL、(123.6±67.3)mL,以上两项比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 相较于子宫动脉栓塞后行腹腔镜下剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶去除术,腹腔镜下子宫动脉暂时阻断后行剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶去除术在治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠成功率及安全性高,住院时间短,费用低,出血少及术后治疗不良反应比栓塞少,值得推荐。

本文引用格式

LIU Qiongfen , SHENG Xiujie , LYU Yongge , KE Yan , SHEN Lin , WANG Yan . 腹腔镜子宫动脉暂时阻断在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊治疗效探讨[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2022 , 38(9) : 40 -43 . DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2022.09.009

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic uterine artery temporarily block in cesarean pregnancy. Methods: A total of 60 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) were selected from Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine from May 2019 to May 2021.They were divided into the experimental group and the control group with 30 cases in each group according to the random number table.The experimental group was the one which was excision of cesarean scar pregnancy after laparoscopic uterine artery temporarily blocking, and the control group was the one which was excision of cesarean scar pregnancy after uterine artery embolism.The treatment success rate, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, adverse reactions, postoperative march endometrial thickness and endometrial blood supply were compared between the two groups. Results: The time in the in-department was (7.3±3.3) and (8.9±4.2)days in the experimental group and control group respectively.The hospitalization expenses were (13 566.3±1 967.2) and (19 250.6±1 639.5) yuan; The incidence of side reaction were 16.7 % and 56.7 % respectively.The endometrial thickness was (8.2±1.4) and (6.3±1.6) mm respectively after three months.The differences between the two groups were statisticaliy significant (P<0.05).The treatment success rate of the two groups were 97.6 % and 95.9 % respectively; The operation time was (94.7±15.2)min and (101.3±17.4)min respectively, the intraoperative blood loss was(125.3±35.2)mL and(123.6±67.3)mL respectively, The differences between the two groups were not statisticaliy significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the control group (laparoscopic cesarean scar pregnancy lesion removal after uterine artery embolism), the experimental group (laparoscopic cesarean scar pregnancy lesion removal after uterine artery temporarily blocking) in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy has higher success rate and safety, shorter hospitalization time, lower cost, less bleeding and postoperative treatment side effects, which is worth recommending.

参考文献

[1] Litwicka K,Greco E.Caesarean scar pregnancy:a review of management options [J].Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2013,25(6):456-461.
[2] 中华医学会妇产科学分会计划生育学组.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J].全科医学临床与教育,2017,15(1):5-9.
[3] 袁岩,戴晴,蔡胜.超声在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断的诊断价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2010,19(4):321-324.
[4] 刘真真,戴晴,王铭.包块型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠临床及超声特征分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(6):1006-1010.
[5] 徐玉静,付锦华,褚玉静.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠数字化三维模型在其子宫动脉栓塞术中的应用[J].实用妇产科杂志,2013,29(4):286-289.
[6] 叶青剑, 邓佩霞,沈晓婷,等.剖宫产切口瘢痕妊娠分析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2017,38(4):596-600.
[7] Kiyak H,Wetherilt LS,Seckin KD,et al.Laparoscopic excision of a scar pregnancy and isthmocele repair[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2018,25:582.
[8] 孟宁,何林生,尹春华.腹腔镜子宫动脉暂时阻断术与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗Ⅲ型子宫瘢痕妊娠的疗效分析 [J].实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(06):475-477.
[9] 宋冬梅,夏恩兰,LI Tin-chiu,等.子宫动脉栓塞后宫腔粘连生殖预后分析--附26例报告[J].国际妇产科学杂志,2014,41(5):513-517,581.
[10] 陈家莲,刘佳.子宫动脉暂时阻断在子宫肌瘤剔除术中的疗效分析[J].河北医学,2014,20(9):1452-1455.
[11] 张庆兵.LM术中子宫动脉暂时阻断的意义分析[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2018,15(2):60-63.
文章导航

/