Objective: To investigate the difference between the same isocenter plan and dual-center plan when using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for breast cancer breast-conserving surgery with chest wall and supraclavicular fields combined radiotherapy for reference of clinical treatment. Methods: Ten patients with the same isocenter and 10 patients with double isocenters were collected after breast-conserving surgery with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) irradiation of the chest wall and supraclavicular field, and the patients applied CBCT to record the positional error data of X (left and right), Y (head and foot), and Z (front and back) in the three linear directions of the center points (once a week) to keep the same conditions of the original plan, and the centers were corrected using the positional error to generate error plans. The centroid coordinates were corrected using the positioning errors and brought into the planning system to generate an error plan. Under the premise that 90% of the target volume of the original plan reached 90% of the prescribed dose, the changes in the actual dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk and the differences in the therapeutic parameters of the two types of single-center and dual-center radiotherapy plans caused by the errors were evaluated. Results: Compared with single-center and double-center error plans, the maximum dose Dmax (t=-4.744, P＜ 0.001), mean dose Dmean (t=-2.288, P=0.025), percentage of volume encompassed by 90% of the prescribed dose V90% (t=-3.216, P=0.002), and 110% of the volume encompassed by 110% of the prescribed dose (Z=-3.838, P＜0.001), and hotspot dose D1cc (t=-6.051, P＜0.001) were lower in the single-center group than those in the double -center group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). In terms of organs at risk, the percentage of volume encompassed by 500 cGy dose in the contralateral lung, V5 (Z=-2.373, P=0.018), Dmean (Z=-2.534, P=0.011), spinal cord Dmax (=-4.417, P＜0.001), and thyroid Dmean (t=-4.535, P＜0.001) were higher in the two-center group than those in the single-center group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05), and the differences in the remaining parameters were not statistically significant. In terms of treatment parameters, the treatment time (t=-2.621, P=0.010) was higher in the two-center group than in the single-center group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05), while the difference in the parameters of the number of machine jumps was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The same isocenter radiotherapy plan of chest wall field combined with supraclavicular field after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer is superior to the double isocenter radiotherapy plan in reducing the error leading to high dose in the target area, dose hotspots and protection of organs at risk.
CHEN Shengqing
,
BAI Jing
,
LI Xiaoming
,
WU Zhonglai
,
ZHANG Zhiyu
,
SUN Jinxia
. A comparative study of single and dual center techniques for combined supraclavicular radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery[J]. Journal of Baotou Medical College, 2024
, 40(12)
: 43
-48
.
DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2024.12.008
[1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249.
[2] Van Limbergen E, Weltens C. New trends in radiotherapy for breast cancer[J]. Curr Opin Oncol, 2006, 18(6):555-562.
[3] Baliski C, Jay M, Hamm J. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with low re-excision rates following breast conserving surgery for non-palpable invasive breast cancers[J]. Am J Surg, 2021, 221(6):1164-1166.
[4] Kowalczyk R, Nowosielski K, Cedrych I, et al. Factors affecting sexual function and body image of early-stage breast cancer survivors in poland: A short-term observation[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2019, 19(1):e30-e39.
[5] 阎艳红, 高伟, 郭晓慧. 早期乳腺癌保乳术后行三维适形放射治疗和二维放射治疗的临床效果观察[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2021, 36(6):951-953.
[6] 夏小林. 基于向量旋转理论的乳腺癌三野照射无缝衔接技术研究[D].暨南大学, 2015.
[7] 杨海芳, 刘建平, 时秀菊, 等. 脊柱多发转移瘤放射治疗中固定铅门技术的应用[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2021, 28(7):520-525.
[8] 张修龙, 李兆斌, 黄国锋, 等. 乳腺癌保乳术后调强放疗摆位误差的剂量学研究[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2009, 17(8):1555-1556.
[9] 中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会. 乳腺癌放射治疗指南(中国医师协会2020版)[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2021, 30(4):321-342.
[10] 肖嘉宁, 孙显松, 杨志伟, 等. 乳腺托架与举臂支架对乳腺癌放射治疗摆位误差的对比研究[J]. 中国医学装备, 2023, 20(1):37-41.
[11] Hodapp N. The ICRU Report 83:prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2012, 188(1):97-99.
[12] Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, et al. Breast cancer, version 3.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2020, 18(4):452-478.
[13] 吴珊瑜. 热塑成型垫+乳腺托架联合固定对乳腺癌保乳术后放疗摆位误差及放射性皮炎的影响研究[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2023, 36(6):967-969.
[14] 何友安, 应薇, 李勇. 乳腺癌腋窝锁骨上淋巴引流区三维适形放疗技术的应用[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2010, 23(6):492-494.
[15] Miles EA, Venables K, Hoskin PJ, et al. Dosimetry and field matching for radiotherapy to the breast and supraclavicular fossa[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2009, 91(1):42-48.
[16] van Mourik A, van Kranen S, den Hollander S, et al. Effects of setup errors and shape changes on breast radiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2011, 79(5):1557-1564.
[17] Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge[J]. Crit Care Med, 2007, 35(1):64-68.
[18] Krueger EA, Fraass BA, McShan DL, et al. Potential gains for irradiation of chest wall and regional nodes with intensity modulated radiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003, 56(4):1023-1037.
[19] Schallenkamp JM, Miller RC, Brinkmann DH, et al. Incidence of radiation pneumonitis after thoracic irradiation: Dose-volume correlates[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 67(2):410-416.
[20] 金汉钰, 李文辉, 常丽, 等. 乳腺癌手术后放疗病人血清心肌钙蛋白T测定与心脏损伤的研究[J]. 当代医药论丛, 2015, 13(6):241-242.
[21] 林布雷, 柯瑞全. 乳腺癌患者调强放疗摆位误差与生理特征参数的相关性研究[J]. 西藏医药, 2022, 43(3):38-40.
