Diagnostic value of combined detection of tumor markers for benign and malignant pleural effusion

  • LI Yanming ,
  • WANG Cuifeng ,
  • REN Meiying
Expand
  • 1. Graduate School of Baotou Medical College,Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology,Baotou 014040,China;
    2. Department of Laboratory Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College,Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology

Received date: 2022-03-29

  Online published: 2023-03-08

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of combined detection of tumor markers ProGRP, CEA, CYFRA21-1, NSE and SCC in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pleural effusion.Methods: A total of 131 cases of pleural effusion diagnosed as benign pleural effusion and malignant pleural effusion in the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College from January 2020 to January 2021 were collected, including 87 cases of BPE and 44 cases of MPE. The concentrations of ProGRP, CEA, CYFRA21-1, NSE and SCC in pleural effusion of patients were detected by chemiluminescence method, and the levels of tumor markers in benign and malignant pleural effusion were compared. Five tumor markers were combined in different ways, and the diagnostic values of different combinations were compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) corresponding to the combination of ProGRP+CEA+CYFRA21-1+NSE was the largest (0.841), and the sensitivity was 77.3 %, the specificity was 85.1 %, the positive likelihood ratio was 5.188, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.267, with the highest diagnostic value. Conclusion: The combination of ProGRP+CEA+CYFRA21-1+NSE is superior to other combinations in terms of diagnostic efficacy, specificity, sensitivity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio, and has important reference value in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion.

Cite this article

LI Yanming , WANG Cuifeng , REN Meiying . Diagnostic value of combined detection of tumor markers for benign and malignant pleural effusion[J]. Journal of Baotou Medical College, 2023 , 39(2) : 36 -40 . DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2023.02.007

References

[1] 伍燕兵, 杜莹, 逯勇, 等. 胸腔积液病因分析[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2017, 16(5): 490-494.
[2] 陈静. 胸腔积液病因分析及临床治疗[J]. 中国实用医药, 2014, 9(30): 83.
[3] 吴迪, 刘盛国, 杨凯, 等. 胸腔积液的病因分布及临床特点[J]. 广东医学, 2020, 41(14): 1459-1463.
[4] Dixit R, Agarwal KC, Gokhroo A, et al. Diagnosis and management options in malignant pleural effusions[J]. Lung India, 2017, 34(2): 160-166.
[5] Wu YB, Xu LL, Wang XJ, et al. Diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy in malignant pleural effusion[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2017, 17(1): 109.
[6] Porcel JM. Malignant pleural effusions because of lung cancer[J]. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2016, 22(4): 356-361.
[7] 孙美琪, 张薇, 郝倩文, 等. 肿瘤标志物对良恶性胸腔积液鉴别的研究进展[J]. 实用肿瘤杂志, 2020, 35(3): 278-283.
[8] 段云, 康钰龄, 郑虹蕾, 等. fPSA %、PSAD、proGRP水平对前列腺癌及骨转移的诊断价值[J]. 西部医学, 2021, 33(4): 605-610.
[9] 陈阳育, 徐莉莉, 伍燕兵, 等. 血清及胸腔积液中四种肿瘤标志物联合应用对良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断价值的评估[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2021, 28(3): 212-222.
[10] Lepusc M, Vivero M. Updates in effusion cytology[J]. Surg Pathol Clin, 2018, 11(3): 523-544.
[11] Yang Y, liu YL, Shi HZ. Diagnostic accuracy of combinations of tumor markers for malignant pleural effusion: an updated meta-analysis[J]. Respiration, 2017, 94(1): 62-69.
[12] 李东风, 于卫民. 食管鳞癌患者血清CEA、ProGRP、CA19-9联合检测的诊断价值[J]. 中国卫生工程学, 2021, 20(02): 265-267.
[13] 屈雪, 秦晓松. 胃泌素释放肽前体、癌胚抗原和神经元特异性烯醇化酶在食管癌诊断中的价值研究[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2020, 12(2): 144-147.
[14] 屈重行, 葛瑞瑞, 陈文霞, 等. 胃癌患者血清CYFRA21-1、TuM2-PK、ProGRP的表达和意义[J]. 中国卫生工程学, 2021, 20(2): 210-213.
[15] 梁改红, 陈艳红. 外周血亲环素B、胃泌素释放肽前体、维生素D结合蛋白在胃癌根治术病人中的表达及对术后复发的影响[J]. 安徽医药, 2021, 25(5): 970-974.
[16] Wojcik E, Kulpa JK. Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) as a biomarker in small-cell lung cancer diagnosis, monitoring and evaluation of treatment response[J]. Lung Cancer (Auckl), 2017 ,8:231-240.
[17] Kim H, Jung HI, Kwon SH, et al. Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and CEA is associated with poor prognosis in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2019, 96(4): 191-200.
[18] 李振雪, 刘大敏, 刘宁, 等. 联合检测CEA、CA15-3、CA19-9、β-HCG、TPA 5种肿瘤标志物对鉴别良恶性胸腔积液的价值[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2019, 23(6): 947-950.
[19] Dal Bello MG, Filiberti RA, Alama A, et al. The role of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE in monitoring tumor response to Nivolumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients[J]. J Transl Med, 2019, 17(1): 74.
[20] Guo wH, Yuan L, Ma L, et al. The diagnostic efficacy of CYFRA21-1 on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2019, 43(3): 266-272.
[21] Ren H, Hu Y, Xie T, et al. Effect of gefitinib on serum EGFR and CYFRA21-1 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2019, 18(4): 4167-4175.
[22] Yangc F, Jia Y, yanc H. The application of CYFRA21-1 in cervical lesions screening in high-risk human papillomavirus infected women[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2016, 87(9): 617-620.
[23] 罗莉, 刘玉荣, 苏磊. 食管鳞癌患者血清TK1与SCCA表达及其预后价值[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2020, 27(5): 353-359.
[24] 刘涛, 杨燕, 刘博, 等. 联合检测胸腹腔积液sCD44V6, CEA, CYFRA21-1, CA199, NSE, CA125对良恶性疾病鉴别诊断价值研究[J]. 现代检验医学杂志, 2020, 35(2): 53-55.
Outlines

/