Objective: To explore the effect of Munro scale and ELPO scale on the risk efficacy of pressure injury in surgical patients. Methods: A case-control study was conducted to select 312 patients who were scheduled to undergo surgery as the research objects.The Munro scale and ELPO scale were used to assess the risk of pressure injury in patients during surgery, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), ordon index, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Results: A total of 29 patients with pressure injury, with an incidence of 9.29 %.When using the two scales for evaluation, there was a statistical difference in the scale scores between the pressure injury group and the non-pressure injury group (P<0.05).The areas under the ROC curve of Munro and ELPO scales were 0.773 and 0.878, respectively, and the optimal thresholds were 23.5 and 17.5 points,indicating that the scale had the best prediction performance. Conclusion: Both Munro and ELPO scales can assess the risk of pressure injury in surgical patients, but the predictive performance of ELPO scale is higher than that of Munro scale.
HUANG Qionglei
,
JIN Yin
,
SHI Liangliang
. Comparison of the Munro scale and the ELPO scale for assessing the risk of pressure injuries in surgical patients[J]. Journal of Baotou Medical College, 2022
, 38(9)
: 71
-75
.
DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2022.09.016
[1] Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society-Wound Guidelines Task Force .WOCN 2016 guideline for prevention and management of pressure injuries (ulcers):An executive summary[J].J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2017, 44(3):241-246.
[2] Joseph J,Mclaughlin D,Darian V,et al.Alternating pressure overlay for prevention of intraoperative pressure injury[J].J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs,2019,46(1):13-17.
[3] Xiong C,Gao XL,Ma Q,et al.Risk factors for intraoperative pressure injuries in patients undergoing digestive surgery:a retrospective study[J].J Clin Nurs,2019,28(78):1148-1155.
[4] 高兴莲,熊璨,杨英,等.术中压力性损伤患者围手术期特征的回顾性分析[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(3):42-45.
[5] 吴晓舟,刘晓黎,王泠.围手术期压力性损伤风险评估量表应用的研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(8):1047-1050.
[6] Munro CA.The development of a pressure ulcer risk-assessment scale for perioperative patients[J].AORN J,2010,92(3):272-287.
[7] 李冬雪,盛孝敏,唐佳,等.改良版Munro围术期成人压疮风险评估量表在手术患者压疮评估中的预测性研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2018,43(2):297-301.
[8] Lopes CM, Haas VJ, Dantas RA,et al.Assessment scale of risk for surgical positioning injuries[J].Rev Lat Am Enfermagem,2016,24:e2704.
[9] Nassaji M,Askari Z,Ghorbani R.Cigarette smoking and risk of pressure ulcer in adult intensive care unit patients[J].Int J Nurs Pract,2014,20(4):418-423.
[10] 史桂蓉,王晓慧,刘萍,等.Scott Triggers评分表与Munro量表评估手术患者压力性损伤的效果比较[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(7):43-46.
[11] Holmes R,Macchiano K,Jhangiani SS,et al.Nutrition know-how.Combating pressure sores:nutritionally[J].Am J Nurs,1987,87(10):1301-1303.
[12] 孙欣悦,吴金球,程云,等.养老机构老年人压力性损伤风险因素树模型的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2018,53(S1):75-83.
[13] 余松林.医学统计学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:175.
[14] Lin SL,Ma YY,Zou HD.Enhanced Youden's index with net benefit:a feasible approach for optimal-threshold determination in shared decision making[J].J Eval Clin Pract,2020,26(2):551-558.
[15] 李冬雪,李钱玲,向明菊,等.两种不同量表对手术获得性压力性损伤预测效果的对比研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2021,(6):1-5.
[16] Delmore B,Kent M.An educational implementation process staff survey:lessons learned[J].Adv Skin Wound Care,2018,31(5):234-238.
