Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic uterine artery temporarily block in cesarean pregnancy. Methods: A total of 60 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) were selected from Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine from May 2019 to May 2021.They were divided into the experimental group and the control group with 30 cases in each group according to the random number table.The experimental group was the one which was excision of cesarean scar pregnancy after laparoscopic uterine artery temporarily blocking, and the control group was the one which was excision of cesarean scar pregnancy after uterine artery embolism.The treatment success rate, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, adverse reactions, postoperative march endometrial thickness and endometrial blood supply were compared between the two groups. Results: The time in the in-department was (7.3±3.3) and (8.9±4.2)days in the experimental group and control group respectively.The hospitalization expenses were (13 566.3±1 967.2) and (19 250.6±1 639.5) yuan; The incidence of side reaction were 16.7 % and 56.7 % respectively.The endometrial thickness was (8.2±1.4) and (6.3±1.6) mm respectively after three months.The differences between the two groups were statisticaliy significant (P＜0.05).The treatment success rate of the two groups were 97.6 % and 95.9 % respectively; The operation time was (94.7±15.2)min and (101.3±17.4)min respectively, the intraoperative blood loss was(125.3±35.2)mL and(123.6±67.3)mL respectively, The differences between the two groups were not statisticaliy significant (P＞0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the control group (laparoscopic cesarean scar pregnancy lesion removal after uterine artery embolism), the experimental group (laparoscopic cesarean scar pregnancy lesion removal after uterine artery temporarily blocking) in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy has higher success rate and safety, shorter hospitalization time, lower cost, less bleeding and postoperative treatment side effects, which is worth recommending.