临床医学论著

ISR联合结肠成形术治疗超低位直肠癌的效果观察*

  • 龙俊宇 ,
  • 朱秋平 ,
  • 史学伟 ,
  • 白庆阳
展开
  • 1.包头医学院第一附属医院肿瘤中心,内蒙古包头 014010;
    2.包头市中心血站
白庆阳

收稿日期: 2025-03-10

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-19

基金资助

*包头市卫生科学技术局(项目名称:包头市卫生健康科技计划;项目编号:2023wsjkkj58)

Observation on theeffect of ISR combined with colonoplasty in the treatment of ultra-low rectal cancer

  • LONG Junyu ,
  • ZHU Qiuping ,
  • SHI Xuewei ,
  • BAI Qingyang
Expand
  • 1. Cancer Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Baotou 014010, China;
    2. Baotou Central Blood Station

Received date: 2025-03-10

  Online published: 2025-11-19

摘要

目的: 评估联合结肠成形术的经括约肌间保肛手术(intersphincteric resection, ISR)在超低位直肠癌患者中的治疗效果。方法: 选取2021年1月至2024年12月包头医学院第一附属医院连续收治、符合纳排标准的90例直肠癌患者为研究对象,接受ISR联合结肠成形术者为观察组30例,接受传统Miles及Dixon手术的各30例患者为对照1组(M组)与对照2组(D组),比较3组患者术后远端切缘(distal resection margin, DRM)阳性情况、并发症发生率、保肛率、Wexner失禁评分和生活质量满意度mFIQL(modified fecal incontinence quality of life, mFIQL)评分等指标。结果: 3组总体显微镜检查切缘阴性(resection with microscopically negative margins, R0)切除率差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),M组与D组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组与M组和D组两两比较后差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),提示ISR联合术式在实现R0切除方面,其效果介于传统的Miles术和Dixon术之间。观察组的保肛率为100%,高于D组的保肛率。术后3个月、6个月、9个月观察组的术后Wexner评分均值均低于D组(P<0.05),提示肛门功能优于D组。观察组的术后mFIQL评分低于M组(P<0.05),表明其生活质量优于后者;观察组与D组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后复发情况分析显示观察组术后复发率低于D组(P<0.05)。结论: 相较于传统手术方式,联合结肠成形术的ISR手术显示出同等程度的瘤体切除效果,以及在保肛率、术后肛门功能和生活质量方面的优势。

本文引用格式

龙俊宇 , 朱秋平 , 史学伟 , 白庆阳 . ISR联合结肠成形术治疗超低位直肠癌的效果观察*[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2025 , 41(10) : 47 -51 . DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2025.10.009

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of intersphincteric resection (ISR) combined with coloplasty in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer. Methods: A total of 90 rectal cancer patients who were continuously admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College from January 2021 to December 2024 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected as the research objects. Thirty patients who underwent ISR combined with colonoscopy were selected as the observation group, and 30 patients who underwent traditional Miles and Dixon surgeries were selected as the control group 1 (M group) and control group 2 (D group). The positive rate of distal resection margin (DRM), incidence of complications, anal preservation rate, Wexner incontinence score and modified fecal incontinence quality of life (mFIQL) score were compared among the three groups. Results: There was significant difference in the resection rate of resection with microscopically negative margins (R0) among the three groups (P<0.05), and there was significant difference between group M and group D (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the observation group and the group M and group D (P>0.05), suggesting that the effect of ISR combined surgery in achieving R0 resection was between the traditional Miles surgery and Dixon surgery. The anal preservation rate of the observation group was 100%, which was higher than that of the D group. The mean postoperative Wexner score of the observation group was lower than that of the D group at 3 months, 6 months and 9 months after operation (P<0.05), suggesting that the anal function was better than that of the D group. The postoperative mFIQL score of the observation group was lower than that of the M group (P<0.05), indicating that its quality of life was better than that of the latter, but there was no significant difference between the observation group and the D group (P>0.05). Postoperative recurrence analysis showed that the recurrence rate of the observation group was lower than that of the D group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional surgical methods, ISR surgery combined with coloplasty shows the same degree of tumor resection effect, as well as advantages in anus-preserving rate, postoperative anal function and quality of life.

参考文献

[1] 王锡山.从中美结直肠癌流行病学特征看结直肠癌早诊早治的重要性[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(1):26-33.
[2] 王林, 顾晋.腹会阴联合切除术历史回顾及现状[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(9):812-816.
[3] 惠春霞, 陈文婕, 钱永刚, 等.内蒙古自治区居民超重/肥胖多水平分析[J].慢性病学杂志, 2020, 21(3):319-322.
[4] 孙祺, 董昱辛, 赵星科, 等.内蒙古地区男性患者年龄、体质量指数与精液常规参数及DNA完整性的关系研究[J].内蒙古医科大学学报, 2023, 45(S1):14-17.
[5] Huscher C, Silecchia G, Croce E, et al.Laparoscopic colorectal resection. A multicenter Italian study[J].Surg Endosc, 1996, 10(9):875-9.
[6] Sun L, Zhou J, Ji L, et al.Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer:a propensity score matching analysis[J].J Robot Surg, 2024, 18(1):83.
[7] Ge W, Shao LH, Qiu YD, et al.Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer:short-term outcomes[J].J Minim Access Surg, 2025, 21(1):60-65.
[8] Annicchiarico A, Martellucci J, Solari S, et al.Low anterior resection syndrome:can it be prevented[J].Int J Colorectal Dis, 2021, 36(12):2535-2552.
[9] Kobayashi Y, Yagi M, Iiai T, et al.Comparison of a colonic J-pouch and transverse coloplasty pouch in patients with rectal cancer after an ultralow anterior resection using fecoflowmetric profiles[J].Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009, 24(11):1321-6.
[10] Wakhlu A, Wakhlu AK.Technique and long-term results of coloplasty for congenital short colon[J].Pediatr Surg Int, 2009, 25(1):47-52.
[11] Hashimoto H, Shiokawa H, Funahashi K, et al.Development and validation of a modified fecal incontinence quality of life scale for Japanese patients after intersphincteric resection for very low rectalcancer[J].J Gastroenterol, 2010, 45(9):928-35.
[12] Changfa X, Xuesi D, He L, et al.Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022:profiles, trends, and determinants[J].Chinese Medical Journal, 2022.
[13] Hawkins AT, Albutt K, Wise PE, et al.Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer in the twenty-first century:indications, techniques, and outcomes[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, 22(8):1477-1487.
[14] Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, et al.Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours[J].Br J Surg, 1994, 81(9):1376-8.
[15] Xv Y, Fan J, Ding Y, et al.Latest advances in intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer[J].Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2020, 2020:8928109.
[16] Yuge K, Miwa K, Fujita F, et al.Comparison of long-term quality of life based on surgical procedure in patients with rectal cancer[J].Front Oncol, 2023, 13:1197131.
[17] Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, et al.Quality of life in rectal cancer patients:a four-year prospective study[J].Ann Surg, 2003, 238(2):203-13.
[18] 刘非凡, 张斌, 卓光鑽, 等.腹腔镜经括约肌间切除术联合结肠成形术治疗超低位直肠癌的疗效与安全性研究[J].结直肠肛门外科, 2022, 28(5):443-448.
[19] Piozzi GN, Khobragade K, Aliyev V, et al.International standardization and optimization group for intersphincteric resection (ISOG-ISR):modified Delphi consensus on anatomy, definition, indication, surgical technique, specimen description and functional outcome[J].Colorectal Dis, 2023, 25(9):1896-1909.
[20] Chinese expert consensus on intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer (2023 edition)[J].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2023, 26(6):536-547.
[21] Obi JO, Gutiérrez-Barbosa H, Chua JV, et al.Current trends and limitations in dengue antiviral research[J].Trop Med Infect Dis, 2021, 6(4).
文章导航

/