护理学专栏

小儿危重病护理评分的个体化护理联合肺泡灌洗在重症肺炎气管插管患儿中的应用

  • 周许艳 ,
  • 焦鸿虹 ,
  • 杨欣
展开
  • 南阳市第二人民医院(PICU),河南南阳 473000

收稿日期: 2023-03-27

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-22

Application of individualized care combined with alveolar lavage in children with severe pneumonia undergoing tracheal intubation

  • ZHOU Xuyan ,
  • JIAO Honghong ,
  • YANG Xin
Expand
  • Nanyang Second People's Hospita(PICUl), Nanyang 473000, China

Received date: 2023-03-27

  Online published: 2024-03-22

摘要

目的: 分析基于小儿危重病护理评分的个体化护理联合肺泡灌洗在重症肺炎(severe pneumonia,SP)气管插管患儿中的效果。方法: 选取2020年1月至2021年9月期间收治的SP气管插管患儿94例作为研究对象,均接受肺泡灌洗,依据随机数字表法分成研究组与对照组,各47例。对照组接受常规护理干预,研究组接受基于小儿危重病护理评分的个体化护理。统计对比两组康复效果(机械通气时间、住院时间)、并发症发生率、家属护理满意度以及干预前后生活质量[简明健康状况量表(SF-36)]、血气指标[动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)]。结果: 研究组患者住院时间、机械通气时间短于对照组(P<0.05);研究组患者并发症发生率(2.13%)低于对照组(21.28%)(P<0.05);干预后研究组患者PaO2高于对照组(P<0.05),PaCO2低于对照组(P<0.05);干预后两组SF-36评分高于干预前,且研究组患者高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组患者家属护理满意度(97.87%)高于对照组(76.60%)(P<0.05)。结论: 基于小儿危重病护理评分的个体化护理联合肺泡灌洗应用于SP气管插管患儿,可缩短机械通气时间与住院时间,改善血气指标,减少并发症发生,优化生活质量,增加家属护理满意度。

本文引用格式

周许艳 , 焦鸿虹 , 杨欣 . 小儿危重病护理评分的个体化护理联合肺泡灌洗在重症肺炎气管插管患儿中的应用[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2024 , 40(3) : 84 -87,96 . DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2024.03.016

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effect of individualized care combined with alveolar lavage based on Pediatric critical illness score (PCIS) in children with severe pneumonia (SP) undergoing tracheal intubation. Methods: A total of 94 SP children undergoing endotracheal intubation in our hospital from January 2020 to September 2021 were selected as the study subjects and divided into the study group and control group using random number table method, with 47 cases in each group. Alveolar lavage was performed on all the 94 SP children. The control group was given the routine nursing intervention, and the research group received individualized care based on the PCIS. The rehabilitation effect (mechanical ventilation time, length of hospital stay), complication rate, nursing satisfaction of family members and quality of life before and after intervention (SF-36), blood gas index (PaCO2, PaO2) were statistically analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: The times of hospitalization and mechanical ventilation in the study group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group (2.13% vs 21.28%)(P<0.05). After intervention, PaO2 in the study group was higher than that in the control group, and PaCO2 was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). The SF-36 score of the two groups after intervention was higher than that before intervention, and it was higher in the study group than the control group(P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of family members in the study group was higher than that in the control group (97.87% vs 76.60%) (P<0.05). Conclusion: Individualized care combined with alveolar lavage based on PCIS could shorten the time of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization, improve blood gas index, reduce complications, optimize the quality of life, and improve the nursing satisfaction of family members.

参考文献

[1] Blanc J, Locatelli I, Rarau P, et al. Retrospective study on the usefulness of pulse oximetry for the identification of young children with severe illnesses and severe pneumonia in a rural outpatient clinic of Papua New Guinea[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(4): e0213937.
[2] Urner M, Jüni P, Hansen B, et al. Time-varying intensity of mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure: a registry-based, prospective cohort study[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2020, 8(9): 905-913.
[3] Russell FM, Reyburn R, Chan J, et al. Impact of the change in WHO's severe pneumonia case definition on hospitalized pneumonia epidemiology: case studies from six countries[J]. Bull World Health Organ, 2019, 97(6): 386-393.
[4] 李晶晶, 杨晓敏. 品管圈联合小儿危重病例评分法在儿科低年资护士病情观察能力提升的进展[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2018, 47(17): 2099-2100.
[5] 中国医师协会急诊医师分会. 中国急诊重症肺炎临床实践专家共识[J]. 中国急救医学, 2016, 36(2): 97-107.
[6] Wang LL, Song YL. Efficacy of zinc given as an adjunct to the treatment of severe pneumonia: A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled trials[J]. Clin Respir J, 2018, 12(3): 857-864.
[7] Florin TA, Tancredi DJ, Ambroggio L, et al. Predicting severe pneumonia in the emergency department: a global study of the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN)-study protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(12): e041093.
[8] 张淑平. 压疮护理小组干预策略对重症肺炎合并呼吸衰竭气管插管患儿面部压疮风险及家属护理满意度的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(11): 2009-2011.
[9] 卢艳辉, 刘振奎, 李世阳, 等. 血清学指标联合小儿危重病例评分和Brighton儿童早期预警评分预测脓毒症患儿死亡的巢式病例对照研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(15): 1800-1806.
[10] 彭亮, 乔婕, 郑成东, 等. 小儿危重症病例评分联合血清可溶性髓样细胞触发受体1、涎液化糖链抗原-6水平对重症肺炎患儿预后的预测价值研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2019, 27(10): 45-49.
[11] 陈昭宏, 杨富芝, 马勤. 小儿危重病例评分法预测婴幼儿支气管肺炎预后的临床价值[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(11): 1517-1519.
[12] 劳玉妹, 黄志萍, 石怀英. 个体化护理对心肌梗死支架术后并发心力衰竭患者遵医行为的影响[J]. 河北医药, 2021, 43(3): 460-463.
文章导航

/